🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim endured losing against Grimsby. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Over Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Supreme Power Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

The Neoliberal Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss them for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.